Lib Dems press for cannabis legalisation after Treasury finds it would be worth millions

Domingo Na Casa, April 2014 by Circuito Fora do Eixo

The Liberal Democrats are pressing for cannabis legalisation despite a lack of interest from the Home Office after a government report found it would be worth millions to the economy.

A Treasury study commissioned during the days of the coalition government reviewed claims from the Institute for Social and Economic Research that with taxes and reduced court and policing costs a move to legalise cannabis would be worth as much as £1.25bn a year.

Whilst the Treasury disputed the extent of the benefit, it did agree that such a move could be worth as much as £800m. 2.2m people are thought to have used the drug in the last year, smoking 216 tonnes of the stuff.

David Cameron’s Tory government has a long-standing opposition to ending prohibition on cannabis, despite widespread reports that the prime minister himself smoked cannabis whilst at school.

In a canned statement Lib Dem MP Norman Lamb said:

“We must end the hypocrisy of senior politicians admitting to using cannabis in younger years – and describing it as ‘youthful indiscretions’ – whilst condemning tens of thousands of their less fortunate fellow countrymen and women to criminal records for precisely the same thing, blighting their careers.”

He added that “public health education and restrictions at the point of sale” similar to those imposed on regular cigarettes could be used to reduce use of the drug.

The Lib Dems also pointed to benefits found in two American states that have chosen to legalise cannabis. In Colorado early evidence was said to show:

  • Any rise in cannabis use has been broadly in line with changes seen elsewhere in the US.
  • No increase in road fatalities.
  • 59 percent of the recreational market has now been legalised, regulated, and taxed, which is a significant contraction in the untaxed criminal market.
  • The state has collected a cumulative revenue total of $73.5m for the first seven months of 2015.

While in Washington State:

  • Retail marijuana sales have generated over $80m in tax revenues.
  • Violent crime rates have declined.
  • State wide rates of youth use and traffic fatalities have remained stable.

In Parliament on Monday MPs debated legalising the cannabis trade, including the production, sale and use of it, after a petition was signed by 220,000 asking them to do so.

Responding to the debate a government spokesman said:

“Substantial scientific evidence shows cannabis is a harmful drug that can damage human health. There are no plans to legalise cannabis as it would not address the harm to individuals and communities. Cannabis can unquestionably cause harm to individuals and society.”

It is not clear why such arguments would not apply to alcohol, cigarettes and sugar. The spokesman went on:

“Legalisation of cannabis would not eliminate the crime committed by the illicit trade, nor would it address the harms associated with drug dependence and the misery that this can cause to families.”

A fair point, since prohibition has clearly been so effective in these regards…

Image Credit – Domingo Na Casa, April 2014 by Circuito Fora do Eixo

Civil war among Labour MPs as McDonnell reverses fiscal charter support

John McDonnell, July 2009 by Plane Stupid

The bitter feuding of the 1980s will be at the forefront of many Labour MPs’ minds after a fight broke out within the party over shadow chancellor John McDonnell’s decision not to support the government’s fiscal charter.

Jeremy Corbyn’s right-hand man had agreed to support Tory chancellor George Osborne’s plans to create a budgetary surplus, but reversed this decision in a letter to MPs, writing:

“I believe that we need to underline our position as an anti-austerity party by voting against the charter on Wednesday.

“We will rebuff any allegation of being deficit deniers by publishing for the debate our own statement on budget responsibility. We will set out our plan for tackling the deficit not through punishing the most vulnerable and decimating our public services but by ending the unfair tax cuts to the wealthy, tackling tax evasion and investing for growth.”

A meeting of the Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP) was described by MPs as “feral”, “shambolic”, and – in one comment from Ben Bradshaw reported by a number of outlets – “a total fucking shambles”.

“I don’t think I’ve ever heard a weaker round of applause at the PLP than the one John McDonnell just got,” one MP told the New Statesman.

The battle within the party appears to stem from confusion on McDonnell’s part about Osborne’s requirement for an absolute budget surplus rather than a current budget surplus, which would leave the government room to borrow for investment.

Many outlets are also reporting fears that the campaigning group Momentum, which was created out of the campaign that got Corbyn elected, will soon be targeting Labour MPs it views as unsympathetic to the Corbyn cause.

If true this would echo attempts by the former Labour leader Neil Kinnock to fight back against the Militant tendency, a hard left faction that was purged by the Labour leadership during the 80s.

Image Credit – John McDonnell, July 2009 by Plane Stupid

One way or the other, the EU referendum will be the death of independent Britain

Union Abstract, December 2013 by AK Rockefeller

Many an Englishman breathed a sigh of relief on the September morning last year that it emerged their Scottish countrymen had not voted to break up the United Kingdom.

If Britons thought that the question of Scottish independence would be settled by the ballot they have since been disappointed. Support for the severing of ties with the English (and, less so, the Welsh and Northern Irish) has only grown since the vote, and the trend shows little sign of reversing.

Not only are the Scottish National Party preparing to schedule another “once in a generation” referendum in the coming years, but they have seized the European Union referendum as another chance to split from Britain if England votes one way and Scotland votes another.

Such plans show the spontaneous rulemaking involved in questions of identity. Nobody would argue that Cornwall should have an independence referendum if it as a region went the opposite way to Britain in the EU vote, in much the same way no independent republic of Glasgow has been formed after the city said “yes” to independence.

Even so, Scotland could well have a second referendum in the wake of Brexit, so long as the margin by which it differed from the rest of Britain was large enough. But the truth is that even a vote to remain in the EU will probably be the undoing of the final remnants of the British Empire – and not just because of the Scots.

There seems to be a wilful ignorance among europhiles that the EU is to a great extent already a state. It has its own currency, its own passports, an (admittedly tiny) standing army, a foreign policy representative, a president, a civil service and a parliament. At its weakest, the body might reasonably be termed a confederacy.

Eurosceptics have also made much of the phrase “ever closer union”, a commitment from the 1957 Treaty of Rome that created the EU’s predecessor. One of prime minister David Cameron’s few admitted aims going into negotiations prior to the referendum is to have this abandoned, a demand that will be rebuffed by the rest of Europe.

Europhiles might deny the significance of the phrase, but it speaks to the forces that brought the EU into being in the first place. Fear of continental war between France and Germany, fear of the Russian bear, and fear of Europe’s falling position in global affairs have all combined over the years to stitch together the EU members in tighter knots.

Now faced by a resurgent Russia on its eastern flank, a migration crisis from the south and south-east, and the fallout from the stupidity of adopting a single currency without close economic union, the EU has a greater need to bind itself together than at any point since the fall of the Berlin Wall.

Where Britain, which wishes the EU was just a free trade agreement, fits into this is mysterious to many of those campaigning to remain in. Associate or second-tier membership is often mentioned, though it is hard to see how we will not end up like Switzerland or Norway under this scheme – obliged to follow rules set by an increasingly unified central bloc.

The obvious solution to this problem would be to surrender to European federalism, which would also fix the problems of democratic deficit, half-witted foreign policy and economic malfunction within the EU.

Were this to happen the laws, culture and habits of the various member states of the EU would eventually equalise, and the notion of European nationhood that many of the EU’s founding fathers envisioned would finally be achieved. But in the process the unique identities of Europe’s countries would be eroded in a European mush.

As such Britain finds itself facing several unappealing alternatives in this coming referendum. It can vote to leave the EU and probably lose Scotland; it can remain a second-tier member and see itself marginalised within the bloc; or it can surrender to ever-closer union.

Amputation, subjugation or assimilation are thus the only items on the menu. And either way, independent Britain is no more.

Image Credit – Union Abstract, December 2013 by AK Rockefeller

Europhiles strike back with ‘Britain Stronger in Europe’ video campaign

EU Grunge Flag, April 2012 by Nicolas Raymond

Campaigners looking to keep Britain within the European Union have been oddly quiet over the last few weeks as their opponents jostle for position as the main Brexit advocates.

All that changed today with the launch of Britain Stronger in Europe, a campaign backed by the three living former prime ministers and a host of senior business figures, including West Ham vice chair and Tory peer Karren Brady, easyJet chief executive Carolyn McCall, and Richard “Beardy” Branson, founder of Virgin.

https://youtu.be/AkSf7XSr2CI

The slickness of the campaign video is to be expected given its establishment backing, but more interesting is their sneaky substitution of the word “Europe” in place of “EU”.

Unless somebody creates a technology that can haul the British Isles across the Atlantic, Britain is doomed to remain adjacent to Europe until tectonic plates make it otherwise. What the europhiles want to convey is the sense that the cultural and trade benefits of Europe and the EU are one in the same.

This will no doubt be countered by cries of “Love Europe, hate the EU” from their opponents, but the move also stands in contrast to attempts by Stuart Rose, chair of the “In” campaign, to advertise EU membership as a patriotic option.

Expect much more on this as both sides dig their respective trenches and prepare for a long war.

Image Credit – EU Grunge Flag, April 2012 by Nicolas Raymond

Podcast Ep. 18: Conservative Conference, EU Referendum and Russia in Syria

David Cameron at Conservative Conference Manchester, October 2015 by the Conservatives

After three weeks apart Jazza and Jimmy are finally reunited, and the sexual tension has never been greater.

We discuss the protests and content at the Tory party conference in Manchester, the egg slinging, the leadership posturing, the weird standing and everything in between.

We then segway seamlessly into the EU referendum campaigns being launched and how scared Jazza is of leaving, before finally, offering some interesting perspectives on Russia choosing to barge it’s way into Syria. Is it such a bad thing?

Image Credit – David Cameron at Conservative Conference Manchester, October 2015 by the Conservatives