Piggate: Did David Cameron actually give a dead pig a good porking?

Pig, August 2008 by Nick Saltmarsh

In the annals of Tory sleaze few allegations have matched the claim that prime minister David Cameron inserted his penis into the mouth of a dead pig as part of an initiation ceremony at an obscure club in Oxford University.

The claim has sent Fleet Street into paroxysms of joy, confirming most of what people want to believe about the poshness of Call Me Dave – incidentally the title of the biography from which this charge originates – as well as the cloistered perversions of the Oxbridge elite.

Currently being serialised in the Daily Mail, Call Me Dave is the work of Tory peer and pollster Michael Ashcroft and former Sunday Times political editor Isabel Oakeshott. The, er, porking passage in question goes as follows:

“But Cameron went a great deal further. He also got involved in the notorious Oxford dining society, the Piers Gaveston, named after the lover of Edward II, which specialises in bizarre rituals and sexual excess.

“A distinguished Oxford contemporary claims Cameron once took part in an outrageous initiation ceremony at a Piers Gaveston event, involving a dead pig. His extraordinary suggestion is that the future PM inserted a private part of his anatomy into the animal’s mouth.

“The source — himself an MP — first made the allegation out of the blue at a business dinner in June 2014. Lowering his voice, he claimed to have seen photographic evidence of this disgusting ritual.”

Some months later this same MP is said to have provided the name of the photograph’s owner and the picture’s dimensions, as well as adding that the pig’s head had been in the lap of a Piers Gaveston member at the time. Ashcroft and Oakeshott approached the owner of the photo for confirmation, without success.

That appears to be the sum of the evidence in the public domain that Cameron may have giving the swine a taste of his wiener. Speaking to Channel 4, Oakeshott distances herself from the claim by saying it was not reported as a confirmed fact, but merely as an allegation that readers could take or leave.

By any standard this is a dodge from Oakeshott, who knows her pedigree and the claimed credibility of her source, as well as the reverse snobbery among much of the public, would lead many to conclude that it was more likely true than not.

More convincing is Oakeshott’s defence that the tale is but a few paragraphs in a 200,000 word book, though it is hard to believe that she did not anticipate the story sparking headlines in Fleet Street when it was included in the Daily Mail extract.

Cameron’s confirmed membership of the Bullingdon Club, an Oxford society for the posh once frequented by London mayor Boris Johnson and chancellor George Osborne, does support the idea he might have been part of Piers Gaveston, as does the fact that as a distant relative of the Windsors Cameron is certainly privileged enough to be a candidate for such societies.

Lurid stories of university club initiations have also regularly appeared in the press over the last few years, some involving intense drinking, odd sexual practices or the playing of a game of rugby in Edinburgh with a live chicken used in place of a ball. Molesting dead swine is therefore not that farfetched as an entry requirement.

Despite this the allegation that Ashcroft is publishing this after he was snubbed by the offer of a lowly position in Cameron’s government has damaged the credibility of the claims. In an extract from the book, Ashcroft wrote:

“After putting my neck on the line for nearly 10 years – both as party treasurer under [former Tory leader] William Hague and as deputy chairman – and after ploughing some £8m into the party, I regarded this as a declinable offer. It would have been better had Cameron offered me nothing at all.”

Without a second photograph or a second source – unlikely, given the secretive nature of such clubs – it will also be hard to confirm the piggate story. Whether it even matters, given the fact most prime ministers have probably done stupid, obscene things throughout (and after) their youths should be enough to bore Fleet Street before too long.

Image Credit – Pig, August 2008 by Nick Saltmarsh

Tim Farron hints at possible Labour defections to Lib Dems after Corbyn victory

Tim Farron, October 2014 by the Liberal Democrats

The Liberal Democrat leader Tim Farron revealed he has been in conversation with a number of Labour luminaries following the elevation of hard left MP Jeremy Corbyn to the head of the party.

Over last weekend Farron had apparently fielded calls from a number of leading Labourites, perhaps including frontbench MPs, in discussions that made him feel like an “agony aunt”.

Speaking to the Evening Standard, he said:

“I’ve had various unsolicited texts, some of them over the weekend, where I felt like I was being an agony aunt rather than anything else. People who have been members of the [Labour] party for as long as I’ve been a member of mine who feel that they don’t recognise their party anyone and feel deeply distressed.”

He added:

“The bottom line is…people in the Labour Party need to understand they can have conversations with me, which may or may not be conclusive, which will remain totally between me and them.”

The Lib Dem leader, who was elected in July in a closely fought contest with Norman Lamb, also said that he saw an opportunity to move into the centre now that Labour has steered to the left under Corbyn.

This is despite the party’s destructive general election that left the party with a mere eight MPs, with many progressives dismayed abandoning the party over its support for university tuition fees, and some even branding the Liberals “Yellow Tories”.

Although Farron’s comments hint at potential defections, in another interview this week he was reluctant to discuss defections or a potential Labour split reminiscent of that which created the Social Democratic Party, which saw four leading figures from Labour peel off into a more centrist unit.

Farron told BuzzFeed that it was “far too soon” to discuss such a split, adding on the subject of potential defections: “That’s not something I’m wanting to talk about particularly, that’s an internal matter for them.”

Image Credit – Tim Farron, October 2014 by the Liberal Democrats

Jeremy Corbyn is distrusted in all policy areas apart from the National Health Service

Jeremy Corbyn national threat poster parody, September 2015 by Byzantine_K

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn is proving to be widely distrusted among the British electorate on almost all political issues except the National Health Service (NHS).

A survey from the pollster YouGov showed that the North Islington MP was not trusted to take “the right decisions” on issues including government spending, taxes, migration, the EU, economics, terrorism and defence.

What issues do you trust Jeremy Corbyn on by YouGov, September 2015

Labour voters were also shown by the poll as being out of step with the rest of the country in their expectations for their new leader, forecasting a stronger leadership from Corbyn and better chances of him winning the next general election in 2020 than the general population.

How well do you expect Corbyn to do by YouGov, September 2015

The findings follow Corbyn’s first appearance as leader at prime minister’s questions (PMQs) that received a mixed response from pundits and those on social media after the MP decided to read out questions crowdsourced from his supporters.

Whilst some approved of the greater solemnity that the Labour leader had brought to the weekly interrogation of David Cameron, others argued that Corbyn did not scrutinise the prime minister’s answers closely enough.

The poll adds to a growing body of evidence suggesting that Corbyn will not be able to win a general election, many political scientists having concluded that the May election was largely won on the basis of which party was believed to have the better leader and greater economic competence, according to Britain Votes 2015.

Full survey results from YouGov can be viewed here.

Image Credit – Jeremy Corbyn national threat poster parody, September 2015 by Byzantine_K

Copyright case against Kim Dotcom rebuffed by US presidential candidate

Kim Dotcom portrait, October 2012 via Thierry Ehrmann

Internet entrepreneur Kim Dotcom has enlisted an influential ally as he entered the last leg of a battle to prevent extradition to the United States on charges of copyright infringement and wire fraud related to his website Megaupload.

Lawrence Lessig, an outsider in the Democratic presidential nomination race and Harvard Law School professor, filed an affidavit in defence of Dotcom, who will face the New Zealand courts on Monday in a bid to prevent the extradition.

Challenging the allegations of copyright infringement, Lessig claimed that the facts of the case do not establish that Dotcom and his co-defendants themselves infringed:

“A showing of willful criminal copyright infringement requires compact factual proof identifying a specific copyrighted work, a right of the owner that has been violated, the geographical location of the infringement and other specific facts needed to establish a violation of United States criminal law. Such compact facts are absent here.”

He added:

“The generalized accusations, defective and irrelevant allegations, scattered facts of alleged multiple infringements and statistics set forth in the superseding indictment and record of the case do not satisfy requirements of proof but rather manifest unreliability of the overall approach.”

The Harvard professor went on to argue that the crime of “secondary copyright infringement” that Dotcom stands accused of does not exist under American law, with Lessig saying that American Congress has never defined such a crime even though such infringement is recognised in civil law.

Defending Megaupload in general, Lessig referred to the so-called Sony Doctrine which defends technologies that can be used for illegal purposes so long as they have substantial legal purposes, the standard having originated in the Betamax case against Sony over the use of its video cassettes to record copyrighted television shows.

“Under civil copyright law, internet service providers, such as Megaupload, do not have a duty to investigate potential infringement,” the law professor argued.

Lessig then went on to reject the case against Dotcom for conspiracy to commit copyright infringement

“There is no showing of specific criminal ‘willful’ infringements committed by specific individual users. There is an even more serious lack of evidence of communications between respondents and such alleged users needed to prove an agreement that is subject to laws of conspiracy.”

…and then turned to the case against Dotcom for Megaupload’s online abuse tool’s alleged failure to take down all links to a given file rather than just the ones being reported:

“The DOJ [Department of Justice] appears to be asserting that an ISP [Internet service provider] like Megaupload, which receives copyright take down notices identifying one URL, must search for and delete all duplicate files used by different users in the cloud system or be subject to a copyright or fraud claim. In my opinion the DOJ’s novel theory of copyright or fraud liability is erroneous.”

In summary Lessig concluded that extraditing Dotcom was not possible:

“It is my opinion that the Superseding Indictment and Record of the Case filed by the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) do not meet the requirements necessary to support a prima facie [“on first appearance”] case that would be recognized by United States federal law and subject to the US – NZ Extradition Treaty.”

The hearing against Dotcom and his co-defendants will begin next week.

Image Credit – Kim Dotcom portrait, October 2012 via Thierry Ehrmann

Jeb Bush: Let’s put Margaret ‘Milk Snatcher’ Thatcher on US $10 bill

Margaret Thatcher on US $10 bill by Al Jazeera

Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Call to undefined function create_function() in /home/jimmyni1/public_html/wp-content/plugins/wp-spamshield/wp-spamshield.php:2033 Stack trace: #0 /home/jimmyni1/public_html/wp-includes/class-wp-hook.php(324): rs_wpss_encode_emails() #1 /home/jimmyni1/public_html/wp-includes/plugin.php(205): WP_Hook->apply_filters() #2 /home/jimmyni1/public_html/wp-includes/post-template.php(256): apply_filters() #3 /home/jimmyni1/public_html/wp-content/themes/graphy/content.php(23): the_content() #4 /home/jimmyni1/public_html/wp-includes/template.php(792): require('/home/jimmyni1/...') #5 /home/jimmyni1/public_html/wp-includes/template.php(725): load_template() #6 /home/jimmyni1/public_html/wp-includes/general-template.php(206): locate_template() #7 /home/jimmyni1/public_html/wp-content/themes/graphy/home.php(19): get_template_part() #8 /home/jimmyni1/public_html/wp-includes/template-loader.php(106): include('/home/jimmyni1/...') #9 /home/jimmyni1/public_html/wp-blog-header.php(19): require_once('/home/jimmyni1/...') #10 /home/jimmyni1/public_html/index.php(17): require('/home/jimmyni1/...') #11 {main} thrown in /home/jimmyni1/public_html/wp-content/plugins/wp-spamshield/wp-spamshield.php on line 2033