Andy Burnham leaves open possibility of another tilt at Labour leadership

Andy Burnham, September 2010 by Victoria MacDonald

During the last Labour leadership contest Andy Burnham ruled out running for a third time, telling PoliticsHome that he wouldn’t be standing again.

Yet in an interview with Liverpool Echo the shadow home secretary seemed to leave space for another go. When asked whether he would run again he said:

“I always thought not. I’ve tried twice and I think there’s a limit to how many times you can stand. I have the feeling that if it was to be my time it would have been this one. But you don’t know what the future brings. I’ve always said I will always serve the party in any way I can but I don’t expect to [run again].”

This kind of language seems to echo that of the Tory Boris Johnson, who when asked about the party leadership said that “if the ball came loose from the back of the scrum, which it won’t of course, it would be a great, great thing to have a crack at.”

Burnham has previously said he “definitely” won’t be standing again, but perhaps he hopes that when Labour needs a new leader he might be called on in the manner of Lucius Quinctius Cincinnatus, a Roman dictator who only took power when called upon by the empire.

Image Credit – Andy Burnham, September 2010 by Victoria MacDonald

Greater Manchester Police Federation chair tells Tory MP Nigel Evans to ‘get over’ himself

Police Band, Manchester Remembrance, November 2010 by Stuart Grout

A police chief from Greater Manchester criticised the Tory MP Nigel Evans on Tuesday for his complaints about how the local police handled hostile crowds at the Conservative conference in the city last week.

Ian Hanson, chair of the Greater Manchester Police Federation, a trade union for the city’s force, responded to remarks from Evans in the Commons describing protestors’ behaviour as “vile abuse tantamount to hate crimes”, and demanding answers from local police.

As reported by the Right Dishonourable, the event saw journalists spat on and one young Tory hit in the forehead with an egg. Some 19 people were arrested throughout the course of the conference.

However Hanson rebutted Evans’ criticism, according to Manchester Evening News:

“Mr Evans has had a glimpse into the real world of what policing looks like in 2015, which is the fact that we do not have the police officers to provide a ‘ring of steel’ around him as we once did.

“Things got a bit uncomfortable and we dealt with it – get over yourself Mr Evans, you are no more important than everybody else in Manchester who gave up their police officers to keep you safe. You should be thanking the communities and police officers of Greater Manchester, not attacking them.”

The police chair went on the note that Greater Manchester Police has lost nearly 2,000 officers since 2010, in a climate of government cuts under the Tory-Liberal coalition.

Police chiefs have called policing the event “incredibly complex”, owing to some 70,000 protestors thought to have turned up during the four-day conference – making it the biggest demo in Mancunian history according to Hanson.

“Mr Evans makes no mention of the long hours worked by the men and women of GMP and the months of planning that went into the policing effort,” he added. “Instead, he focuses in on what affects him.”

Image Credit – Police Band, Manchester Remembrance, November 2010 by Stuart Grout

If Jennifer Lawrence and Theresa May can be disliked, it’s only because they are in control

Jennifer Lawrence, June 2015 by alien_artifact

What do actress Jennifer Lawrence and the politician Theresa May have in common?

Plenty, to be fair. They are both white, Western, English-speaking women, which already puts them close together in the potential spectrum of human differences.

But according to Marisa Bate, a writer for women’s website the Pool, they are also both under undeserved pressure to be liked because of their sex. According to Bate, “likeability is another way of telling a woman to put up and shut up.”

Her comments follow after Lawrence wrote a letter for the newsletter Lenny’s Letter, put together by Girls creator Lena Dunham, in which the actress complained about being paid less than her male co-stars in the film American Hustle:

“I would be lying if I didn’t say there was an element of wanting to be liked that influenced my decision to close the deal without a real fight. I didn’t want to seem ‘difficult’ or ‘spoiled’. At the time, that seemed like a fine idea, until I saw the payroll on the Internet and realised every man I was working with definitely didn’t worry about being ‘difficult’ or ‘spoiled’.”

Bate compares this to Theresa May, who told a women’s conference earlier this week:

“It’s always easy to say something in order to be liked. It’s harder to do something you believe but that people don’t like.”

It’s long been said that women generally lack assertiveness, and that men (and even women) often see behaviour from women as bolshy that in men is merely bold. As Bate puts it:

“When women are likeable, they are digestible, manageable, without opinion and without trouble. Theresa May and Jennifer Lawrence’s refusal to be likeable makes me like them all the more.”

But there is something unconvincing in all of this, which is that politicians and actors male and female are in the business of being liked.

Indeed, one of May’s principle weaknesses as a future Tory leader is that she seems so humourless and uncaring. Her pitch to the Tory right with a now infamous anti-migration speech at the party conference in Manchester last week would have alienated many even if she had a penis, as would her streak of authoritarianism.

Compare her to Boris Johnson, a politician so well liked he is referred to by his first name, and one will see the difficulties May has put herself in with her “tough” approach. Compare also to George Osborne, once vilified for his cuts, and we also see that behaviour seen as nasty can damage politicians male and female.

The only thing that would remove this political obligation to be liked is a weak opposition, which is one reason why the Tories are willing to roll out a package of extensive cuts this parliament, damn the bad publicity.

Actors like Lawrence are not immune from this. Some may be able to get away with coming off as arseholes, but if that is so it is because their brand is so big that people will work with them however difficult they are – which is to say if Lawrence can behave how she wants it is because she is already in a good bargaining position.

Sure, men have more leeway to be dicks, socially speaking. We are also generally more assertive, and to some extent that is reinforced by society. But being liked will always be an advantage in life to both men and women, and to claim that it is laudable to be disliked is naive.

Image Credit – Jennifer Lawrence, June 2015 by alien_artifact

Ruder, probing Corbyn ruffles Cameron at second PMQs bout

Jeremy Corbyn, PMQs, October 2015 by BBC

If the first round of Jeremy Corbyn’s “people’s prime minister’s questions” was regarded by journalists as a bit of a flop, his refined approach for the second bout looked much stronger.

On Wednesday afternoon, the Labour leader began his six questions as leader of the opposition by reading out an email from a single mum of a disabled child Kelly, who works more than 40 hours each week and is paid £7.20 per hour.

If all this sounds like a lamentable conference speech from Corbyn’s predecessor Ed Miliband do not be fooled. For Corbyn’s deployment of this question was explicitly to attack Cameron for his government’s revising of tax credits, which both the Institute for Fiscal Studies and the Treasury admit will make people worse off in the short-run.

A pregnant pause in the question in which Corbyn glared at the government benches showed the problems the Tories will have in countering such tactics, which combine anecdotes with statistics. Whilst the latter will be at Cameron’s fingertips, the former will not be so close to hand. And it’s harder for Tories to jeer voters than Labour pols.

Following the advice of many pundits after his first attempt at PMQs, Corbyn followed up his email reading with further interrogation, even embracing the rudeness he initially claimed to avoid. “The prime minister’s doing his best, and I admire that,” he deadpanned at one stage, to approval from his side of the House.

This is not quite “the new approach”, to use the same term that Cameron did as he sought to silence jeers from the opposition benches. Indeed the end result was somewhere in the middle of the ear-damaging bellows that used to dominate the entirety of PMQs and the silence that greeted Corbyn’s first session at the head of Labour.

Whilst this will not appease those that see the behaviour of the politicians in these sessions as childish, it will play rather better on television and radio, and not allow Cameron the free hits he was given last time round as Corbyn slowly read through one email after another.

(There is also, in my view, something appalling about MPs sitting in silence no matter what is being said by the government or a speaker. Some jeers are richly deserved.)

For his part Cameron tried to smear Corbyn with the chaos of Labour’s approach to the fiscal charter from earlier this week, saying:

“Now tonight the Labour party has a choice. A week ago they were committed to getting the deficit down and running a surplus just like us. But for some reason – I know not why – they’ve decided to do a 180 degree turn and vote for more borrowing forever.”

Corbyn’s performance at PMQs will not affect the difficulties he is likely to have with poorer voters sceptical of migration, nor Blairites and those on the left who are willing to accept more private sector involvement in delivering public services.

But at least in the one session of the Commons every hack pays attention to he looks competent, astute, and on the side of the poor he aspires to represent. At least for now the rebel Corbyn is starting to play the game.

Image Credit – Jeremy Corbyn, PMQs, October 2015 by BBC

Nick Clegg: Britain’s ascension to EU was done ‘with a shrug of the shoulders’

Nick Clegg and Evan Davis, October 2015 by Newsnight

The former leader of the Liberal Democrats has been mostly quiet in the wake of his humbling general election defeat in May, happy to let Tim Farron steer what remains of William Gladstone’s party.

Yet Nick Clegg’s appearance on Newsnight this Tuesday showed the politician and former Eurocrat mulling on Britain’s future with Europe, in a rather mild manner for someone who fears the country may be about to make a grave mistake.

“I think the psychological, almost emotional circumstances in which the United Kingdom joined the then European Community were in many ways less emotive than say – if you were the founding member states Germany, France, and so on – peace over war.”

It is a favoured trope of British political commentary that we do not really do ideology, instead preferring to keep our heads down and stick to bean-counting, which many believe will have to be reflected on both sides of the referendum if they want to catch vacillating voters.

The “shrug of the shoulders” that Clegg refers to is also consistent with Britain’s historic commitment to constitutional fudge, as evinced in the lack of a central written constitution, the uneven devolution in the regions and many of the conventions that guide parliamentary life.

He never entirely answers the question of whether Britons feel closer to the Yanks than other Europeans, though there may be something telling in his description of “our cousins in America” – “our cousins in Europe” does not quite convince.

Though Clegg may well be right that leaving the EU could salt our diplomatic relationship with the Americans, it seems unlikely that Britons will ever think of themselves as “European” in the cultural sense implied when it is listed alongside “British” or “English”.

As such it means a vote to stay in the EU probably means a vote to stay in the second tier of the club, outside an increasingly unified eurozone. Whether that is a better option than leaving altogether will be the key question come the referendum.

Image Credit – Nick Clegg and Evan Davis, October 2015, screencap from Newsnight