Nick Clegg: Britain’s ascension to EU was done ‘with a shrug of the shoulders’

Nick Clegg and Evan Davis, October 2015 by Newsnight

The former leader of the Liberal Democrats has been mostly quiet in the wake of his humbling general election defeat in May, happy to let Tim Farron steer what remains of William Gladstone’s party.

Yet Nick Clegg’s appearance on Newsnight this Tuesday showed the politician and former Eurocrat mulling on Britain’s future with Europe, in a rather mild manner for someone who fears the country may be about to make a grave mistake.

“I think the psychological, almost emotional circumstances in which the United Kingdom joined the then European Community were in many ways less emotive than say – if you were the founding member states Germany, France, and so on – peace over war.”

It is a favoured trope of British political commentary that we do not really do ideology, instead preferring to keep our heads down and stick to bean-counting, which many believe will have to be reflected on both sides of the referendum if they want to catch vacillating voters.

The “shrug of the shoulders” that Clegg refers to is also consistent with Britain’s historic commitment to constitutional fudge, as evinced in the lack of a central written constitution, the uneven devolution in the regions and many of the conventions that guide parliamentary life.

He never entirely answers the question of whether Britons feel closer to the Yanks than other Europeans, though there may be something telling in his description of “our cousins in America” – “our cousins in Europe” does not quite convince.

Though Clegg may well be right that leaving the EU could salt our diplomatic relationship with the Americans, it seems unlikely that Britons will ever think of themselves as “European” in the cultural sense implied when it is listed alongside “British” or “English”.

As such it means a vote to stay in the EU probably means a vote to stay in the second tier of the club, outside an increasingly unified eurozone. Whether that is a better option than leaving altogether will be the key question come the referendum.

Image Credit – Nick Clegg and Evan Davis, October 2015, screencap from Newsnight

Labour fiscal charter chaos spills over into media skirmishes

Treasury, Westminster, April 2012 by Kurt Bauschardt

Poor discipline within the Labour ranks spilled over into the media on Tuesday as a dispute over the party’s approach to the government’s fiscal charter saw several MPs breaking ranks to criticise the leadership.

Emily Thornberry, shadow employment secretary, had told MPs not to text journalists and to keep their voices down at a Parliamentary Labour Party meeting on Monday evening in Parliament, journalists being stood outside the committee room where it took place.

Yet John Mann, MP for Bassetlaw and a member of the Treasury Committee, gave an interview to the BBC and wrote a piece for Politics Home in which he argued that shadow chancellor John McDonnell had been ensnared in a trap by chancellor George Osborne.

The aim of this trap was to weaken Labour’s economic credibility by making its leadership chose between looking profligate if they did not agree to balance the books, or accept spending cuts detested by the party’s core supporters.

Whilst McDonnell had said he would back Osborne’s fiscal charter to balance the books, on Monday he reversed this decision, leading many MPs to criticise the leadership within earshot of journalists.

Writing on Politics Home, Mann said:

“The reality is that to have voted with Osborne would have led to political meltdown in Scotland and McDonnell’s political judgement faces some big questions. New [Jeremy] Corbyn supporters would have been bemused and demoralised. It would have been a political disaster with huge consequences.”

https://youtu.be/49laliNKfgQ

Mann complained that this reversal had occurred without consulting MPs, even though he jokingly praised McDonnell for getting it “right in the end.” But he said the shadow chancellor “looks a bit of a fool” because of his behaviour.

Corbyn, leader of Labour, has been forced to operate a more consensual approach to cabinet management than his predecessors owing to weak support from Labour MPs for his leadership.

Earlier today Diane Abbott gave an interview to BBC Radio 4 in which she attempted to defend her leader to a bemused John Humphrys, adding that “some people are only slowly coming to terms” with the result of the party’s leadership election, in which Blairites were sidelined in favour of hard leftists.

Image Credit – Treasury, Westminster, April 2012 by Kurt Bauschardt

Diane Abbott defends John McDonnell’s fiscal reversal against sceptical John Humphrys

Diane Abbott, May 2012 by Policy Exchange

Hackney MP Diane Abbott went on Radio 4 on Tuesday morning in a bid to rectify the damage caused by news that a civil war had broken out among Labour MPs after the leadership reversed its position on the government’s fiscal charter.

A bemused John Humphrys provoked laughter from Abbott as she attempted to dispel the view that Labour’s chancellor John McDonnell believes “the deficit can go hang”, after it emerged he does not support the government’s plans to balance the budget after investment spending is taken into account.

Continue reading →

The wisdom of Edward Snowden: secret courts, American individualism, and uni censorship

Edward Snowden, January 2014 by DonkeyHotey

Since opening a Twitter account and mocking the NSA, the whistleblower Edward Snowden has been tweeting out his thoughts on a regular basis, much to the delight of his supporters.

In a series of messages yesterday he began by criticising a recent case in Iran in which Washington Post journalist Jason Rezaian was convicted in a secret court.

Continue reading →