Tim Farron holds milk, looks aggrieved, causes much confusion

Tim Farron holding milk

Every politician should have a concerned face, and whatever one thinks of Liberal Democrat leader Tim Farron he certainly knows how to look suitably aggrieved.

Of course with such powers of facial expression one must use them wisely, lest some uncharitable soul leak unused pictures to the press of you holding dairy items for no explicable reason.

Thankfully the Farron was on hand shortly afterwards to explain a scandal literally nobody is calling Milkgate.

Still, the ability to look suitably aggrieved on cue could prove useful should the Libs’ poll ratings fail to improve over the next few years.

Image Credit – Tim Farron holding milk via Marie Le Conte

Lib Dems join peerage frenzy after campaigning for Lords reform

Westminster Old Palace Yard, 1911 by Charles Flower

The Liberal Democrats scooped up a raft of honours and peerages on Thursday for MPs kicked out of Parliament in the general election and donors to the party, despite previously campaigning to turn the Lords into an elected body.

Chief among the new lords is former business secretary Vince Cable, whose defenestration from his Commons seat in Twickenham at the general election by 2,000 votes was seen by many as the apex of the party’s destruction on that night.

He is joined by deputy leader and former Gordon MP Malcolm Bruce, former Berwick-upon-Tweed MP Alan Beith, former Hazel Grove MP Andrew Stunell, and former Bath MP Don Foster, all of whom stepped down before the general election, thus avoiding the rout the other members suffered.

Lynne Featherstone, who held her Commons seat in Hornsey and Wood Green for a decade until she lost by more than 10,000 votes to Labour MP Catherine West earlier this year, will also be made a peer.

Also recognised in the honours was Danny Alexander, second to chancellor George Osborne throughout the coalition government, who was turfed out by more than 10,000 vote in his Commons seat in Inverness, Nairn, Badenoch and Strathspey, but will now be a knight.

Such appointments will fuel suspicion that since its reform under Labour prime minister Tony Blair the Lords and the honours system is regularly abused to empower politicians rejected by voters, as well as invite allegations of hypocrisy upon the Liberal Democrats.

Government guidelines state the wider honours system is intended to recognised those that “made achievements in public life” or “committed themselves to serving and helping Britain”, though ostensibly it recognises those that helped whichever parties happened to be in power at the time.

In a statement Tim Farron, leader of the Lib Dems, said:

“Liberal Democrats are committed to root and branch reform of the House of Lords. Today’s appointments introduce a new wave of Lib Dems determined to fight for change.”

Among the benefits of being a Lord are a £150 or £300 stipend that can be claimed for attending a session in the chamber, as well as the opportunity to influence and delay legislation as it passes up from the Commons for review.

At present the Lords numbers 781, making it the second largest legislative body behind the National People’s Congress in China, a rubber stamping chamber that numbers 2,987, for a nation of more than 1.3bn people.

With these additional peers the Lords will number 826, for a nation of 64m.

Image Credit – Westminster Old Palace Yard, 1911 by Charles Flower

Podcast (ep.6): Labour/ Lib Dem Leadership, Gays in Russia & Her Royal Heilness

Jazza is back from Russia! And in this episode he shed some light on the LGBT life in Moscow with the conversations he had with gay and homophobic Russians.

But not before Jazza & Jimmy discuss the Labour and Lib Dem leaderships. Why is Jazza not Tim Farron’s biggest fan? Why doesn’t Jimmy really care that the Telegraph newspaper wants to sabotage Labour? Find out in this week’s podcast.

And finally we talk about THAT Sun front page, with the Queen doing the Nazi salute as a 7 year old girl. Is it fair for them to publish it? Was the pun ‘Her Royal Heilness’ really that terrible?

 

Make sure you engage with us on social media. Talk to us on Twitter @RightDishonour.

Alternative Sources: The electable Corbyn, a less than Magna Carta, and Hitchens vs Mensh

Alternative Sources: Norman Lamb, Jeremy Corbyn and Westminster

Fallout from the departures of Labour’s Ed Miliband and the Liberal Democrats’ Nick Clegg continued to dominate headlines this week, alongside the anniversary of Magna Carta and a few other other oddities. Here’s what you may have missed:

1. Craig Murray: Nicola Corbyn and the Myth of the Unelectable Left

“The media are working overtime to marginalise Jeremy Corbyn as a Labour leadership candidate on the grounds that he is leftwing and therefore weird and unelectable. But they face the undeniable fact that, Scottish independence aside, there are very few political differences between Jeremy Corbyn and Nicola Sturgeon.”

Though the Scottish National Party (SNP) is probably more rightwing than admitted, the former British diplomat Murray argues an interesting case that Corbyn could be a better choice for Labour than much of the media (including The Right Dishonourable) have argued.

2. Tim Fenton: Don’t Menshn Peter Hitchens

“The Great Man [Peter Hitchens] put the lid on the latest Mensch idiocy as he calmly asked: ‘Don’t seem to have had any reply to this straightforward question. Are your Tweets in fact written by a Teletubby?

It is always a pleasure to have chick-lit author Louise Mensch trashed by all and sundry, and few bloggers are more skilled at narrating a good Twitter hounding than Fenton, a blogger who always has Fleet Street in his sights.

3. Dave Richards and Martin Smith: The Strange Resurrection of the British Political Tradition

“[Britain’s] prescribed mode of governance, that of the Westminster Model, highlighted the unitary character of the British Parliamentary State, organised round the principle of parliamentary sovereignty. In so doing, it delivered an elitist form of top-down government, based on a high concentration of power at the centre, what Brian Barry caustically referred to as a ‘power-hoarding’ approach to governing.”

The general election’s failure to deliver the multi-party politics the country craves has a long historical tradition, as the political academics Richards and Martin explain to the London School of Economics blog.

4. David Allen Green: The Meaning of Magna Carta

“Magna Carta is symbolic of is not a great English constitutional principle, but the lack of one.  It symbolises the capacity of people to nod along at being told they have fictional and nonexistent rights instead of having rights which can actually be enforced. ”

Much has been written of Magna Carta over the last week, but in this informed piece Green – a writer, lawyer and sceptic of the Conservative government’s legal reforms – skewers the popular interpretation of the most famous document in British law.

5. Caron Lindsay: Norman Lamb removes staff for alleged negative push-polling

“It’s clear that Norman Lamb had no idea what was going on and when the complaints were made he took immediate action and suspended two campaign volunteers. He did the right thing, quickly, and should be commended for that.”

A quarrel between Liberal leadership hopefuls Tim Farron and Norman Lamb is given an exhaustive if gushing summary by the editor of Liberal Democrat Voice, an independent blog linked to the party.

Header Image – Norman Lamb (Acumen Images), Palace of Westminster (TRD) and Jeremy Corbyn (David Hunt), with editing by The Right Dishonourable

The next five years will give the Left much to rally around – but will they stop bickering?

Human Rights Act Protest, May 30 2015

For no party has the General Election been sadder than for the Liberal Democrats. Their crumbling from 56 to 8 seats (which may be reduced to 7 if Scottish MP Alistair Carmichael calls a byelection) was perhaps the defining factor in lifting the Tories over the majority threshold in the Commons.

For their pains as the junior half of the coalition the Liberals have been traduced by both sides. Likely knowing their protest vote would vanish and others would abandon them to the fringe Left, the Tories flooded Liberal marginals with cash. The result was the worst drubbing since the Social Democratic Party teamed up with Gladstone’s descendent in the 80s.

In the wake of the collapse the Tories are lining up illiberal bills they could never have got through with the Liberals in tow. One bans legal highs (the Psychoactive Substances Bill). Another launches a censorship scheme (the Extremism Bill). Yet another will authorise more government snooping (the Investigatory Powers Bill).

But perhaps most troubling, and most baffling, is the furore over the Human Rights Act, a 1998 bill that the Tories promised to scrap in what prime minister David Cameron’s press officer claims is a move to make Britain’s Supreme Court “the ultimate arbiter of human rights”. As The Right Dishonourable has argued before, the plan is a mess.

It was this piece of legislation that motivated fragments of the Left to gather near Parliament Square last Saturday. Whilst mostly these were Liberals there was a smattering of the Socialist Worker’s Party (which appears to have set up a permanent gazebo across from Downing Street) and a few odds and sods.

Such rallies these days show in microcosm why the Left was so roundly beaten. Many of its supporters remain bitter that the Liberals ever went into coalition with the hated Conservatives. One bystander even heckled the “Yellow Tories” as a pack of placard-carrying Liberals walked away from the protest, which congregated opposite Downing Street.

That another protest levelled against austerity was taking place at around the same time on Westminster Bridge, not three minutes walk from Downing Street, says much of the split ambitions of the Left these days too. Liberalism and socialism may not be incompatible, but they need not be allies either.

As the views of journalist Owen Jones readily attest, whoever wins the contest for leadership of the Labour party is unlikely to satisfy those who turn out to anti-austerity marches. Much as there is a portion of the Tories who will not accept globalisation, there are those within the Left that rebel against its uglier effects: pollution, deprivation and exploitation. Such people will not savour a return to Blairism.

At least on this front the Liberals do not seem so divided. Tim Farron, the MP and grassroots’ favourite, has been much in view at the post-election meetings, shaking hands and making speeches as he prepares for a leadership bid. Whether he or his fellow MP Norman Lamb wins the ensuing contest, there are not enough Liberals for a major rupture to be anything other than suicide.

That difference aside, both Liberal and Labour will have a challenge to reëstablish what it means to be in opposition, and more broadly what it means to be on the Left. Both have what the corporate world terms a “branding issue”. For Labour this means harnessing some of the breadth that Tony Blair mustered in his hat-trick of victories – a task that may prove impossible for now.

For the Liberals, however, it means adapting to the fractured multi-party state they helped build. It means fewer protest votes. And as Saturday showed, it means greater competition from other leftwing political voices, most obviously in Scotland from the Scottish National Party.

The Left has five years until the next general election. Whether this is enough time remains to be seen.

Header Image – Human Rights Act Protest, May 30th 2015 by The Right Dishonourable