Republican Race to White House Begins

America’s Republican Party has been inundated with presidential candidates for next year’s election, notching up an impressive 17 at the last count.

As such someone at the GOP (“grand old party”, a common nickname for the Republicans) decided that this was too many for there to be a coherent conversation on stage, and invited Fox News to whittle down the crowd to something more manageable in the national debates, the first of which took place on Thursday night.

(And let’s be fair, 17 candidates could end up looking like a pale and male gospel choir on stage, with the exception of neurosurgeon Ben Carson and former HP boss Carly Fiorina.)

The controversial response from Fox News, who hosted the 1st Republican national debate, was to cut those allowed on stage to a mere ten, using polling to decide the candidates’ fates.

This may sound sensible, but at this stage of the presidential race national polling means little. May I remind you that the election will be held 15 months from this primary? And does anyone remember Newt Gingrich from the 2012 race? He was polling at 1st place for over a month, but his position waned and he ended up sidelined.

Fox’s move has become even more scandalous because the broadcaster had said it would take an average of the past five national polls, but this week decided to exclude one. Fox could have also chosen to split the candidates evenly among two debates rather than having what MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow has affectionately called a ‘grown-ups’ and ‘kids’ table’, the latter made up of the seven trailing in the polls.

Even with this setup Twitter lit up when the kids’ table went live a few of hours before the big guns, with Fiorina, former CEO of the technology firm Hewlett-Packard, widely declared the winner, at least on social media.

Carly Fiorina at Southern Republican Leadership Conference, May 2015 by Michael Vadon

Carly Fiorina at Southern Republican Leadership Conference, May 2015 by Michael Vadon

As the main debate kicked off some hours later some questions were hilariously contrived, not least the opener where the candidates were asked if they would support the Republican nomination for president “without question” if it weren’t them. Celebripolitican (I’m claiming that phrase) Donald Trump was the only one who said no, making no attempt to douse the rumours that he may run as an independent candidate.

Overall the broadcast felt more like a series of mini, 60-second interviews with a rowdy crowd and sporadic inter-candidate heckling than the “debate” it was touted as. There were some nearly-hilarious clashes between Trump and Rand Paul, the Kentucky senator standing on a conservative libertarian platform, but they had more shrugging than substance.

Most interactions between the podiums were those of agreement, with little dispute offered on the new Iranian deal, abortion rights or incumbent president Barack Obama’s record. In a rare move away from the obvious line John Kasich, governor of Ohio, did seem warm to gay marriage, saying he attended a same-sex wedding and would support a hypothetical gay son or daughter.

But the show-stealer, and the reason we all tuned in, was undoubtedly Trump, the ‘Billionaire Reality TV Star’ as Sky News had it. And though he wound down in the second half of the debate, he gave us some absolute crackers.

Early in the night Trump fired a shot across the bow of one of one of Fox’s moderators, Megyn Kelly, when she asked him to comment on the fact that he has called women “fat pigs, dogs, slobs and disgusting animals” on social media in the past. “Maybe I shouldn’t be so nice to you,” he snarled back, casting himself as a victim of media scrutiny.

Yet it was not all theatrics from the Trumpster. Indeed on the topic of immigration the businessman made an apt observation, arguing: “If it weren’t for me you wouldn’t be talking about illegal immigration.”

He went on to mention a favourite solution to illegal immigration of the Republican Party, the mythical wall with Mexico:

“We need to build a wall and it needs to be built quickly. And I want to have a big beautiful door in that wall so people can come into this country legally. But we need to build a wall, we need to keep illegals out.”

So begins a long slog towards the presidential election on the 8th November 2016, but the starting gun has been officially fired in a flurry of toupees and podiums. If you missed it, never fear, there will be one of these debates every month until 2016.

Meanwhile the Democratic televised debates, also known as the coronation of Hillary Clinton, will begin in October.

Header Image – Still from Republican presidential debate, Fox News.

Podcast Ep. 8: Lord Sewel, Calais’s Migrant Crisis & Cecil The Lion

This week Jazza & Jimmy plough into the Lord Sewel controversy and which particular bit of his behaviour (snorting cocaine off of sex workers’ breasts included) was the most immoral. Is it time we reassessed the House of Lords?

 

Calais has a SWARM of migrants trying to get into the UK. That ‘swarm’ actually only includes 5000 individuals… so what’s the bug deal? They’re all technically still asylum seekers until proven otherwise, right? What can we do?

 

Finally, Cecil. Zimbabwe’s finest was shot by an American dentist. What a way to go! We discuss whether it’s fair that the shooter, Walter Palmer, has been dragged over the coals for this.

 

This episode will also only come out of one ear… technical difficulties… soz lol!

Podcast Ep. 7: Is Oh My Vlog Racist? London’s Conservative Mayor & Donald Trump

In this week’s Podcast it’s Jazza, Jimmy AND John. Just one more member and we’re a Union J tribute act.

We discuss the new ‘dead-tree’ publication, Oh My Vlog! which focuses on the most popular in the YouTube community like Zoella, Joe Sugg and Alfie Deyes. Does the number of white faces show wider racism in the UK YouTube community and the mainstream media? Three white, privately educated men discuss.

The Conservatives have announced their shortlist for the London Mayoral Election and have snubbed Ivan Massow and Sol Campbell, two high profile candidates, in favour of Zac Goldsmith running against three nobodies. Is this the Tories announcing Goldsmith as their preferred Mayor in all but name? Yes, almost definitely.

And Donald Trump is the leader in the polls on the Republican side of the USA Presidential Elections. This is hilarious. We laugh a lot.

If Jeremy Corbyn doesn’t win the leadership, what exactly is the point of Labour?

Jeremy Corbyn, No More War at Parliament Square, August 2014, Garry Knight

So much for Jeremy Corbyn being the joke candidate at the Labour leadership election.

Ever since The Right Dishonourable dismissed his chances of even securing enough nominations to appear on the ballot paper the MP for Islington North has trounced every expectation: securing support from more Labour constituencies than any other candidate, being backed by trade union Unite, and now polling ahead of every other candidate.

The whine from the Blairites that Labour is making itself unelectable has thus become a howl. Chuka Umunna, the smooth-talking Streatham MP and former leadership contender, went so far as to liken his party to “a petulant child” in an interview on BBC Newsnight. “There is no glory in opposition,” he said. “Ultimately we will betray our people if we don’t get elected.”

Labour’s identity crisis reflects an ongoing feature in the British political system as much as it does the current weakness of the party. Whilst conservatism naturally fits the remit of the protean, managerial modern political party, radicalism of any sort jars with the compromises and mealy-mouthed messaging that New Labour exemplified.

The Iraq War might be the most ostensible reason that many in Labour denounce the legacy of prime minister Tony Blair – the only Labour leader to secure three full terms in office – but for many to the Left of the party New Labour’s collusion with free market capitalism (or in their ominous phrase “neoliberalism”) was the true betrayal of the party’s roots.

They have a point. Parties throughout all democracies morph over time as questions are settled and newer problems arise, but the abandonment of Clause IV, which advocated “common ownership of the means of production”, by Blair in 1995 posed an existential question of Labour that has not been answered: Just why does it exist?

When the party was first formed it was quite clear what its purpose was. The working classes had long been treated as serfs by the patrician class that ruled Britain, unconsulted on political issues and often neglected. Labour changed that, most notably in the wake of the Second World War where Clement Attlee was able to usher in the welfare state as the second Labour prime minister.

Much has changed since then. The shrinking of industry and movement towards the service sector economy has coincided with serious globalisation. As such the unions and working classes that used to sustain Labour were much diminished by the end of the 20th century. Perhaps unsurprisingly, most Britons now see themselves as middle class.

As such Blair’s movement of the party made a deal of sense – arguably he was just responding to the market forces that do a great deal to determine who can be elected in a liberal democracy. But the problem for Labour is not so much its own movement as the response from the opposite benches.

The Tories have not managed to shed their image as “the nasty party”. Quite possibly they never will. But in Cameron and Osborne they have two pragmatic leaders willing to take on the centre ground. Osborne’s faux-adoption of the “living wage” in this year’s budget was one example of this; Cameron’s embrace of gay marriage in the last parliament was another.

This leaves Labour with little room to manoeuvre. Sure, it could do what Liz Kendall wants and throw itself back into Blairism. But its weaker reputation on the economy will surely leave it wanting when faced with a Conservative front bench that, at least by centrist standards, is fairly socially liberal.

After the disaster of Ed Miliband it is understandable the Blairites are lobbying for a return to the centre. Perhaps it might even work to get the party back in power. But whilst that same section of the party jeers at the Labour Left for being a “glorified pressure group”, it should also wonder what the point is of having power after all principle has been abandoned.

Header Image – Jeremy Corbyn, No More War at Parliament Square, August 2014 by Garry Knight

Podcast Ep. 6: Labour and Lib Dem Leadership, Gays in Russia & Her Royal Heilness

Jazza is back from Russia! And in this episode he shed some light on the LGBT life in Moscow with the conversations he had with gay and homophobic Russians.

But not before Jazza & Jimmy discuss the Labour and Lib Dem leaderships. Why is Jazza not Tim Farron’s biggest fan? Why doesn’t Jimmy really care that the Telegraph newspaper wants to sabotage Labour? Find out in this week’s podcast.

And finally we talk about THAT Sun front page, with the Queen doing the Nazi salute as a 7 year old girl. Is it fair for them to publish it? Was the pun ‘Her Royal Heilness’ really that terrible?

 

Make sure you engage with us on social media. Talk to us on Twitter @RightDishonour.