Why Oxford University is the true birthplace of the Cameron government

Nuffield College, Oxford, February 2015 by Martijn van Sabben

Earlier today my brother, who is currently applying for university, remarked that Tony Blair’s government seemed to contain more graduates of Scottish universities than the government of current prime minister David Cameron.

Education is something of an English obsession, Cameron’s government being notorious for being full of Etonians, many of whom went on the join the Bullingdon Club, a rich boys’ society at Oxford University that is infamous for trashing restaurants.

But whilst many lament the role of Eton and private schools more generally for stocking the establishment, less remarked upon is just how narrow Cameron’s cabinet is when it comes to the universities its members attended.

By and large they come from a single university: the same one that is home to the Bullingdon Club:

David Cameron’s cabinet, October 2015
Name Position University
Stephen Crabb Welsh Secretary Bristol and London Business School
Theresa Villiers Northern Ireland Secretary Bristol and Oxford
Chris Grayling Commons Leader Cambridge
Oliver Letwin Chancellor of Duchy of Lancaster Cambridge
Greg Clark Local Gov Secretary Cambridge and LSE
Amber Rudd Energy Secretary Edinburgh
David Mundell Scottish Secretary Edinburgh and Strathclyde
Sajid Javid Business Secretary Exeter
Baroness Stowell Lords Leader None
Patrick McLoughlin Transport Secretary None
Iain Duncan Smith Work and Pensions Secretary None (Sandhurst)
David Cameron Prime Minister Oxford
George Osborne Chancellor Oxford
Theresa May Home Secretary Oxford
Philip Hammond Foreign Secretary Oxford
Michael Gove Justice Secretary Oxford
Jeremy Hunt Health Secretary Oxford
Nicky Morgan Education Secretary Oxford
Elizabeth Truss Environment Secretary Oxford
Justine Greening International Development Secretary Southampton
Michael Fallon Defence Secretary St Andrews
John Whittingdale Culture Secretary UCL

Fully nine of the 22 current cabinet ministers have passed through Oxford as a student in some point of there lives, mostly as a first degree, but also as a second in the case of Northern Irish secretary Theresa Villiers.

Indeed, all of the great offices of state are filled by Oxford graduates: Cameron himself as prime minister, George Osborne as chancellor, Theresa May as home secretary and Philip Hammond as foreign secretary.

Cambridge supplies only three graduates to the current cabinet, the same number that hail from London’s various colleges or Scotland as a whole, meaning that to a great extent the cabinet is dominated by Oxford, Cambridge, Edinburgh and Bristol graduates.

When compared to the composition of the first Blair cabinet from May 1997 the difference is striking:

Tony Blair’s cabinet, May 1997
Name Position University
Alistair Darling Chief Treasury Secretary Aberdeen
Ann Taylor Commons Leader Bradford
Chris Smith Culture Secretary Cambridge and Harvard
George Robertson Defence Secretary Dundee
Jack Cunningham Farming Minister Durham
Mo Mowlam Northern Irish Secretary Durham and Iowa
Gordon Brown Chancellor Edinburgh
Robin Cook Foreign Secretary Edinburgh
Gavin Strang Transport Secretary Edinburgh and Cambridge (Diploma)
Donald Dewar Scottish Secretary Glasgow
Derry Irvine Lord Chancellor Glasgow and Cambridge
John Prescott Deputy PM Hull
Jack Straw Home Secretary Leeds
Clare Short International Development Sec Leeds and Keele
Frank Dobson Health Secretary LSE
Margaret Beckett Trade Secretary Manchester
Nick Brown Chief Whip Manchester
David Clark Chancellor of Duchy of Lancaster Manchester and Sheffield
Tony Blair Prime Minister Oxford
Ivor Richard Lords Leader Oxford
Ron Davies Welsh Secretary Portsmouth and Cardiff
David Blunkett Education Secretary Sheffield
Harriet Harman Social Security Secretary York

My brother’s guess was correct: Seven members of Blair’s first cabinet attended Scottish universities, and the prime minister himself was educated at Fettes College on the outskirts of Edinburgh.

More generally just by looking at the tables one can see a greater range of British universities represented in the Blair cabinet, though it is notable that all of the cabinet did attend university, which is not true of Cameron’s cabinet.

Much has already been made of the swarms of career politicians who go from private school to Oxford (studying philosophy, politics and economics) then to a role as a special advisor, and then finally to the final destination as government minister.

Some academics have argued that educational diversity is a boon to businesses, whilst some would say it is encouraging that so many from the best universities go on to run the country.

But what isn’t disputable is that since Blair left office the pool of unis from which the cabinet is being drawn has narrowed. We are all Oxonians now.

PS: This list was compiled from numerous sources, but the main selection of cabinet ministers was taken from the government’s own website and those pictured in the photograph of Blair’s first cabinet, minus the cabinet secretary Robin Butler, who is a civil servant rather than a politician.

One could well have argued for the inclusion of those who also attend Cameron’s cabinet but are not listed as cabinet ministers, though the general picture would not much change.

Image Credit – Nuffield College, Oxford, February 2015 by Martijn van Sabben

Is the United States already a socialist country?

Bernie Sanders, Arizona, July 2015 by Gage Skidmore

Bernie Sanders, the insurgent Democratic presidential candidate who has eaten into support for Hillary Clinton, is noted for embracing the term “socialist”, a word long tainted by America’s ideological battle with Russian communism during the Cold War.

His adoption of the word was something that Bill Maher, the American comedian turned chat show host, sought to confront directly in an interview with Sanders last week.

Continue reading →

Lib Dems’ Caroline Pidgeon: ‘No house developers are making losses. They make massive profits.’

Caroline Pidgeon, party fringe meeting, September 2009 by Liberal Democrats

One of the first warning signs of the Liberal Democrats smashing at the general election came when the party’s Brian Paddick, a former policeman, was beaten to third place in the 2012 London mayoral election by the Greens’ Jenny Jones.

Paddick’s support had more than halved since the previous mayoral contest in 2008, both as an absolute figure and as a percentage of London’s vote – a result largely attributed to the damage that coalition life had done to the image of the Lib Dems.

It’s a record that Paddick’s successor Caroline Pidgeon will no doubt wish to overcome at the London mayoral election next year.

A former staffer of Brent Council and later a healthcare comms officer, since that contest in 2008 she has sat on the London Assembly, a body that scrutinises the mayor.

Now she is making a tilt at the main title, having been selected through a party poll without any rival after Duwayne Brooks withdrew due to a clashing work commitment (though she noted that the original field contained six candidates, and voters were given an option to restart the primary).

Regardless, most voters will be uninterested in the internal affairs of the Lib Dems, especially given the problems that Londoners are facing.

Speaking to the Right Dishonourable, Pidgeon cited housing as the main issue of this current campaign, saying that the capital faces “a huge crisis” across all different types of homes.

The Tories’ Zac Goldsmith and Labour’s Sadiq Khan, the only two mayoral candidates with a realistic chance of winning the contest, have also picked out housing as a key concern.

The boom in London’s property prices has made the capital’s housing stock a lucrative asset class for the world’s millionaires, but Pidgeon sees the issue in more ordinary terms.

“You need to be settled if your child is at school, and [housing cost] puts huge pressure on Londoners,” she said. Her main strategy to fix this involves a return to council housing, empowering the Greater London Authority – the capital’s government – to invest in housebuilding projects.

Asked about the private sector’s role in this, Pidgeon said: “With developers it’s in their interest only to build so many homes a year because it keeps the prices higher in the market.” Later she added: “None of them are making loses – they’re making massive, massive profits.”

Some people have suggested that it is time to build further into the greenbelt that has long limited London’s extensive urban sprawl. But Pidgeon is opposed.

“I don’t want to build on the greenbelt,” she said. “There’s smarter ways you can develop the housing, and part of it is is being tough with developers.”

Crossrail 2 Route, via Mayor of London, Network Rail and TfLSource: Mayor of London, Network Rail and Transport for London

Transport is the other big issue in Londoners’ minds, most of them having to squeeze themselves in and out of cramped train carriages and buses on a daily basis.

To begin Pidgeon wants to push through existing plans to put more trains onto the Tube, as well as secure funding for Crossrail 2, a new line that will run from Wimbledon to Tottenham.

Another idea she has is to roll out an early-bird fares scheme to incentivise people to travel early. Londoners have already started varying their working patterns in a bid to avoid the rush, according to data from Transport for London (TfL), but Pidgeon hopes her scheme would accelerate this process.

On the touchy subject of nationalising the railways, a debate recently re-opened by Labour’s Jeremy Corbyn, Pidgeon is not convinced a return to full public ownership would be best.

Instead she champions the “concession model” currently used by London Overground, in which private firms have a more limited role than the franchise system used in most of Britain.

“I’m not one of these people that thinks everything the public sector does is marvellous or everything the private sector does is best,” she said.

Another big question facing London is the role that the taxi-hailing app Uber will have against the historic black cabs.

Black cab drivers have blocked major roads recently and even disrupted City Hall meetings to protest against the insurgents, whose drivers are less regulated and undercut the pricey incumbents.

Pidgeon argued that TfL has underinvested in the taxi network. She also said that “private hire companies have been pushing the boundaries” of the law, noting reports of uninsured cars and unlicensed drivers, and as such she would like to see private hire regulation brought up rather than black cab regulation reduced.

“The black taxi is iconic in terms of London,” she said. “It’s hugely important to tourists who come to London and it’s important both parts of the market are kept and supported.”

Condemned Taxis, September 2011 by InvernoDreaming

Source – Condemned Taxis, September 2011 by InvernoDreaming

In reality the best that Pidgeon is likely to expect from this campaign is third place.

One of her rivals, the Greens’ Sian Berry, already told the Right Dishonourable that a Labour mayor would be easier for Green assembly members to influence than a Conservative one.

But on this question of who she would prefer to win Pidgeon equivocates, noting that she is not responsible for the campaigns of her rivals.

As noted above, whether Pidgeon can even come third place will depend on whether she can mitigate the taint of the Lib Dem’s work with the Tories.

Like many of her fellow party members she maintains there was “no choice for our party to go into coalition in the national interest”, adding that they have paid “a heavy price” for doing so.

Unfortunately a summer poll by Survation put the Lib Dems behind not just the Greens but Ukip, a party whose nativist views do not obviously align with the cosmopolitan image of London. What would Pidgeon say to those in the capital hostile to migration?

“We wouldn’t have many public services functioning if we didn’t have migration into our city,” she said, but added that in response to population growth the city needed to build more houses and invest further in public services.

She and the rest of London will find out whether this and the rest of her pitch is convincing to voters in May of next year.

Image Credit – Caroline Pidgeon, party fringe meeting, September 2009 by Liberal Democrats

A quarter of Brits could support a military coup in the right circumstances

British soldier in Saber Strike exercise, June 2014 by US Army Europe

Britons are surprising open to a national coup in the event of an undesirable prime minister, abolition of the monarchy or disbandment of the armed forces, according to a survey by YouGov.

The pollster asked the public whether they might support the army taking control of the country in any circumstances, which revealed a quarter of Britons thought there were scenarios in which they might consider it, whilst half thought there were none.

British Coup Data, by YouGov

Unsurprisingly, Kippers proved to be the most coup-happy bunch, with 44 percent saying they could see themselves supporting a coup compared to the 40 percent who couldn’t, making them the only major national party with majority support for a coup.

Kippers were also more relaxed about the military disobeying civilian command, with almost half saying active members of the armed forces should not always obey civilian orders if they thought the instructions were misguided.

Despite widespread support for civilian control of the military, both the military and the police were more highly trusted to act in the interests of Britain than politicians.

Trust in police, army and pols, by YouGovFurther details of this survey, and a copy of the full results, can be found at the pollster’s website.

Image Credit – British soldier in Saber Strike exercise, June 2014 by US Army Europe

EH Shepard’s Great War and the years before Winnie the Pooh

House of Illustration, October 2015 by Jimmy Nicholls

If you thought children playing soldiers was sinister enough, it is impossible not to be struck by the darkness of a cartoon in which several kids mimic a gas attack, currently on show at the House of Illustration in London.

That this image comes from the pen of Ernest Howard (EH) Shepard, the illustrator behind the Winnie the Pooh and The Wind in the Willows drawings, makes it all the more surprising, especially given that his work throughout the First World War is described as “gentle” in the House’s exhibition.

Continue reading →